Identify three conflict resolution techniques and when to apply them.

Identify three conflict resolution techniques and when to apply them.

• A. Collaboration (win-win for complex issues), Compromise (midpoints for moderate stakes), Assertive/Avoidance (for minor issues or time constraints); choose based on importance and relationships.
• B. Avoidance, Dominance, and Punishment.
• C. Only Collaboration regardless of stakes.
• D. Randomly picking a method.

Answer: (C)

Understanding conflict resolution means choosing the technique based on the situation: how important the issue is, how strong the relationship is, and how much time there is. Collaboration is ideal for complex issues where a durable, win-win solution is possible because it relies on open dialogue and joint problem-solving. Compromise fits when the stakes are moderate and a quick, acceptable outcome is preferred, using give-and-take to reach a middle ground. Avoidance is sensible for minor issues or when emotions are running high and time is needed to cool down or gather more information before acting. This combination—knowing when to collaborate, compromise, or avoid—reflects practical conflict management. The other options rely on unhealthy methods, unrealistic rigidity, or random choice, which don’t support effective resolution.

Understanding conflict resolution means choosing the technique based on the situation: how important the issue is, how strong the relationship is, and how much time there is. Collaboration is ideal for complex issues where a durable, win-win solution is possible because it relies on open dialogue and joint problem-solving. Compromise fits when the stakes are moderate and a quick, acceptable outcome is preferred, using give-and-take to reach a middle ground. Avoidance is sensible for minor issues or when emotions are running high and time is needed to cool down or gather more information before acting. This combination—knowing when to collaborate, compromise, or avoid—reflects practical conflict management. The other options rely on unhealthy methods, unrealistic rigidity, or random choice, which don’t support effective resolution.